Chat with us, powered by LiveChat Stigmas against people with autism - STUDENT SOLUTION USA

PAPER GRADING CRITERIA (30%)
A (80-100%)
Work is OUTSTANDING:
Submission has far
exceeded expectations.
B (70-79%)
Work is VERY GOOD:
Submission exceeds
expectations.
C (60-69%)
Work is
SATISFACTORY:
Submission meets
expectations.
D (50-59%)
Work Is LESS THAN
SATISFACTORY:
Submission meets very
few expectations.
F (0-49%)
Work is UNSATISFACTORY:
Submission does not meet
expectations.
Areas of Evaluation
* This rubric is to compliment information provided on the assignment calendar and discussed in class.
Marks and
Comments
Abstract
A 200-word abstract is provided that clearly articulates and summarizes the research
conducted and focus of the paper. All components of the paper are incorporated into the
abstract (ie. introduction, body, conclusion).
/5
Introduction
Introduces the topic in a creative way that captures the reader?s interest.
The purpose and scope of the paper is identified. Key concepts or terms are defined.
Includes rationale for topic choice
Two perspectives, views or area?s of debate are clearly stated
Where relevant, a thesis or ?stance? is clearly stated.
– Outlines at least 1 area of debate/support
How the topic influences children?s behaviour is clearly discussed, including the function
behaviours may serve.
/10
Body
At least 5 up-to-date (last 5 years) academic resources are utilized to support arguments.
Research literature sources are peer reviewed, current, and relevant.
Uses indirect quotes to support ideas and/or reflections throughout paper.
Minimal use of direct quotes in paper (two to three max).
Utilizes and analyzes research from two perspectives or areas of debate
Supports arguments with relevant theory
Relevant research is clearly and coherently synthesized
Critical thinking is evident
/15*
Discussion and Conclusion
Clearly restates topic and connection with children?s behaviour
Brings topic back into focus using information from the body of the paper to take a stance on
the topic relative to the two perspectives or areas of debate reviewed in the body.
Leaves reader with final thoughts to reflect on related to future areas still needing to be
researched, considered, and/or discussed (ie. critical thinking is evident).
Recommendations for practice and research are clearly stated
/15*
Professional Presentation
There are few to no errors related to spelling, grammar, paragraph, and sentence structure.
APA formatting and referencing is followed, including the reference page and title page
Overall presentation is professional and well organized.
Overall writing is concise and clear.
Use of paragraphs (and/or headings) clearly highlight areas of discussion/debate.
Writing flows from one paragraph/section to the next (ie. transition sentences)
Up to 15% will be
deducted for errors
related to professional
presentation and use
of APA style
referencing and
formatting.
TOTAL /45

error: Content is protected !!