]
a.Output requirements. List three different reports, results of a calculation, or other outputs.
i. Output #1
ii. Output #2
iii. Output #3
b. Input requirements.
i. List the main data elements required to create output #1
ii. List the main data elements required to create output #2
iii. List the main data elements required to create output #3
c.Processing requirements (at least one must have a decision associated with it)
i. Processing required to create Output #1
ii. Processing required to create Output #2
iii. Processing required to create Output #3
II.Technical Requirements (introductory paragraph and 3 requirement statements listed for each area below) [Jawahar, p. 95]
a. Security requirements
b. System control requirements
c. Performance requirements
d. Business continuity requirements (backup, restart, recovery)
III.System Scope Diagrams (introductory/explanatory paragraph and 2 diagrams) [a good explanation and example is at ]
a. Context Diagram [explanation in Conger, p.228; use example in Conger, p.229. Figure 7.2]
b. Use Case Diagram [use example in weblink above]
IV.Data Flow Diagram (introductory/explanatory paragraph and diagram) [Week 4 Content module and weblinks]
a. Data Flow Diagram [explanation in Conger, p.228; use example in Conger, p.230, Figure 7.3; use the tips located in the assignment folder (DFD_Tips.pdf)]
V. Process Models (introductory/explanatory paragraph and 3 items below) [Week 4 Systems Analysis Course Module]
a. Structured English [use example in Systems Analysis Course Module, Process Description Tools]
b. Decision Table [use example in Systems Analysis Course Module, Process Description Tools]
c. Decision Tree [use example in Systems Analysis Course Module, Process Description Tools]
Submitting Your Assignment
Submit your document via your Assignment Folder as Microsoft Word document, or a document that can be ready using MS Word, with your last name included in the filename. Use the Grading Rubric below to be sure you have covered all aspects of the assignment.
GRADING RUBRIC:
|
Criteria |
90-100% Far Above Standards |
80-89% Above Standards |
70-79% Meets Standards |
60-69% Below Standards |
< 60% Well Below Standards |
Possible Points |
|
Functional Requirements |
16-18 Points Three requirements for input, output and processing are clearly stated and correctly inter-related; are logically derived from the Case Study, and demonstrate a sophisticated level of writing. |
14-15 Points Three requirements for input, output and processing are clearly stated and correctly inter-related; are logically derived from the Case Study, and demonstrate a clear understanding of the course concepts. |
12-13 Points Three requirements for input, output and processing are stated and are inter-related; and are derived from the Case Study. |
10-11 Points May present fewer than three requirements for input, output and processing, or they may not be inter-related; and/or may not be derived from the Case Study. |
0-9 Points Functional requirements are not included, or demonstrate little effort. |
18 |
|
Technical Requirements |
11-12 Points Three requirements each for security, system control, performance, and business continuity are clearly stated and are logically derived from the Case Study, and demonstrate a sophisticated level of writing. |
9-10 Points Three requirements each for security, system control, performance, and business continuity are clearly stated and are logically derived from the Case Study, and demonstrate effective writing. |
8 Points Three requirements each for security, system control, performance, and business continuity are provided and are appropriate to the Case Study. |
7 Points Fewer than three requirements each for security, control, performance and business continuity may be provided, and/or they may not be appropriate to the Case Study. |
0-6 Points Functional requirements are not provided, or little effort is demonstrated. |
12 |
|
System Scope Diagrams |
9-10 Points Context diagram and Use Case diagram are correctly constructed, logical, appropriate to the Case Study and demonstrate a sophisticated level of analysis. |
8 Points Context diagram and Use Case diagram are correctly constructed, logical, appropriate to the Case Study and demonstrate accurate analysis. |
7 Points Context diagram and Use Case diagram are provided, and are appropriate to the Case Study. |
6 Points Both Context and Use Case diagrams may not be provided, and/or may not be appropriate to the Case Study. |
0-5 Points Both Context and Use Case diagrams are not provided, or little effort is demonstrated. |
10 |
|
Data Flow Diagram |
9-10 Points Data Flow Diagram is correctly constructed, logical, appropriate to the Case Study and demonstrate a sophisticated level of analysis. |
8 Points Data Flow Diagram is correctly constructed, logical, appropriate to the Case Study and demonstrate accurate analysis. |
7 Points Data Flow Diagram is provided, and are appropriate to the Case Study. |
6 Points Data Flow Diagram may not be correctly contructed, and/or may not be appropriate to the Case Study. |
0-5 Points Data Flow Diagram is not provided, or little effort is demonstrated. |
10 |
|
Process Models |
36-40 Points All three process models – structured English, decision table, and decision tree – are correctly constructed, logical, appropriate to the Case Study and demonstrate a sophisticated level of analysis. All three models describe the same decision process. |
32-35 Points All three process models – structured English, decision table, and decision tree – are correctly constructed, logical, appropriate to the Case Study and demonstrate accurate analysis. All three models describe the same decision process. |
28-31 Points All three process models – structured English, decision table, and decision tree – are provided, and are appropriate to the Case Study. All three models describe the same decision process. |
24-27 Points All three process models may not be provided, may not describe the same decision process, and/or may not be appropriate to the Case Study. |
0-23 Points The three process models are not provided, or little effort is demonstrated. |
40 |
|
Format |
9-10 Points Submission reflects effective organization and sophisticated writing; follows instructions provided; uses correct structure, grammar, and spelling; presented in a professional format; any references used are appropriately incorporated and cited using APA style. |
8 Points Submission reflects effective organization and clear writing; follows instructions provided; uses correct structure, grammar, and spelling; presented in a professional format; any references used are appropriately incorporated and cited using APA style. |
7 Points Submission is adequate, is somewhat organized, follows instructions provided; contains minimal grammar and/or spelling errors; and follows APA style for any references and citations. |
6 Points Submission is not well organized, and/or does not follow instructions provided; and/or contains grammar and/or spelling errors; and/or does not follow APA style for any references and citations. May demonstrate inadequate level of writing. |
0-5 Points Document is extremely poorly written and does not convey the information. |
10 |
|
|
TOTAL Points Possible |
100 |
Stage 2: Requirements Specification 5
