Teacher Placement Planning – Rubric
District Policy 14 points
Criteria Description
District Policy
5. Target 14 points
Planning comprehensively accounts for district policy and/or collective bargaining
procedures, seniority requirements, and union or professional association
mandates.
4. Acceptable 12.18 points
Planning clearly accounts for district policy and/or collective bargaining procedures,
seniority requirements, and union or professional association mandates.
3. Approaching 10.36 points
Planning somewhat accounts for district policy and/or collective bargaining
procedures, seniority requirements, and union or professional association
mandates.
2. Insufficient 9.66 points
Planning minimally accounts for district policy and/or collective bargaining
procedures, seniority requirements, and union or professional association
mandates.
1. No Submission 0 points
Screening Procedures 14 points
Criteria Description
Screening Procedures
5. Target 14 points
Planning and rationalizing specifically includes teacher screening procedures.
4. Acceptable 12.18 points
Planning and rationalizing appropriately includes teacher screening procedures.
Collapse All
3. Approaching 10.36 points
Planning and rationalizing vaguely includes teacher screening procedures.
2. Insufficient 9.66 points
Planning and rationalizing poorly includes teacher screening procedures.
1. No Submission 0 points
Not addressed.
Collaboration 14 points
Criteria Description
Collaboration
5. Target 14 points
Planning and rationalizing insightfully addresses how well the teacher collaborates
with staff and community members to maintain a sense of involvement and trust.
4. Acceptable 12.18 points
Planning and rationalizing reasonably addresses how well the teacher collaborates
with staff and community members to maintain a sense of involvement and trust.
3. Approaching 10.36 points
Planning and rationalizing ambiguously addresses how well the teacher
collaborates with staff and community members to maintain a sense of
involvement and trust.
2. Insufficient 9.66 points
Planning and rationalizing marginally addresses how well the teacher collaborates
with staff and community members to maintain a sense of involvement and trust.
1. No Submission 0 points
Not addressed.
Ethical Principles 14 points
Criteria Description
Ethical Principles
5. Target 14 points
Planning and rationalizing thoroughly addresses how their actions align with the
ethical principles of compassion and concern for the common good.
4. Acceptable 12.18 points
Planning and rationalizing suitably addresses how their actions align with the
ethical principles of compassion and concern for the common good.
3. Approaching 10.36 points
Planning and rationalizing unclearly addresses how their actions align with the
ethical principles of compassion and concern for the common good.
2. Insufficient 9.66 points
Planning and rationalizing inadequately addresses how their actions align with the
ethical principles of compassion and concern for the common good.
1. No Submission 0 points
Not addressed.
Organization 7 points
Criteria Description
Organization
5. Target 7 points
The content is well-organized and logical. There is a sequential progression of ideas
that relate to each other. The content is presented as a cohesive unit and provides
the audience with a clear sense of the main idea. The summary is within the
required word count.
4. Acceptable 6.09 points
The content is logically organized. The ideas presented relate to each other. The
content provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea. The summary is
within a reasonable range of the required word count.
3. Approaching 5.18 points
The content is not adequately organized even though it provides the audience with
a sense of the main idea. The summary may not be within a reasonable range of the
required word count.
2. Insufficient 4.83 points
An attempt is made to organize the content, but the sequence is indiscernible. The
ideas presented are compartmentalized and may not relate to each other; or the
summary is widely outside of the required word count.
Mechanics of Writing 7 points
Criteria Description
includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use
5. Target 7 points
Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-
developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are
varied and engaging.
4. Acceptable 6.09 points
Submission includes some mechanical errors, but they do not hinder
comprehension. Variety of effective sentence structures are used, as well as some
practice and content-related language.
3. Approaching 5.18 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistent
language or word choice is present. Sentence structure is lacking.
2. Insufficient 4.83 points
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.
Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction are used.
1. No Submission 0 points
Total 70 points
