Chat with us, powered by LiveChat   RISK: EXPONENTIAL SMOOTHING FORECASTING AND VALUE OF INFORMATION Risk: Simple Exponential Smoothin - STUDENT SOLUTION USA

 

RISK: EXPONENTIAL SMOOTHING FORECASTING AND VALUE OF INFORMATION

Risk: Simple Exponential Smoothing (SES)

Assignment Overview

Scenario: You are a consultant for the Excellent Consulting Group (ECG). You have completed the first assignment, developing and testing a forecasting method that uses Linear Regression (LR) techniques (Module 3 Case). However, the consulting manager at ECG wants to try a different forecasting method as well. Now you decide to try Single Exponential Smoothing (SES) to forecast sales.

Case Assignment

Using this Excel template: Data Chart For BUS520 Case 4 (see attached ) do the following:

  1. Calculate the MAPE for Year 2 Linear Regression forecast (use the first spreadsheet tab labeled “Year 2 Forecast – MAPE”).
  2. Calculate forecasted sales for Year 2 using SES (use the second spreadsheet tab labeled “SES – MAPE”). Use 0.15 and 0.90 alphas.
  3. Compare the MAPE calculated for the LR forecast (#1 above) with the MAPEs calculated using SES.

Then write a report to your boss in which you discuss the results obtained above. Using calculated MAPE values, make a recommendation concerning which method appears to be more accurate for the Year 2 data: SES or Linear Regression.

Assignment Expectations

Analysis

  • Accurate and complete SES analysis in Excel.

Written Report

  • Length requirements: 4–5 pages minimum (not including Cover and Reference pages). NOTE: You must submit 4-5 pages of written discussion and analysis. This means that you should avoid use of tables and charts as “space fillers.”
  • Provide a brief introduction to/background of the problem.
  • Complete a written analysis that supports your Excel analysis, discussing the assumptions, rationale, and logic used to complete your SES forecast.
  • Give complete, meaningful, and accurate recommendation(s) relating to whether LR or SES is more accurate in predicting sales.

Note: Please Read attached Chapter 3,4,5 and background Reading to be clear. Also Provide Heading for Each Section of Work.

Module 4 – Background

RISK: EXPONENTIAL SMOOTHING FORECASTING AND VALUE OF INFORMATION

Case Background

What if you cannot find another factor that has a high correlation with the forecasted factor? Are there other forecasting methods other than Linear Regression? How do you determine which method is actually the best one?

Chase, C. W., (2013). Demand-driven forecasting: A structured approach to forecasting. John Wiley & Sons. Somerset, NJ. Retrieved from Ebrary.

From the source above, read: SEE ATTACHED

· Chapter 3, pp. 91–93 (the section Some Causes of Forecast Error)

· Chapter 4, pp. 103–113, which provides information on forecast error measures; pay special attention to the sections on the MAPE measurement

· Chapter 5, pp. 125–147; pay attention the sections on Simple Exponential Smoothing (SES)

Download the Excel file 
Case 4 Examples-Practice.xlsx
  (SEE ATTACHED ) that contains an example and a Practice Exercise.

Watch this video that shows how to do SES and calculate MAPE: 

http://permalink.fliqz.com/aspx/permalink.aspx?at=75d6cc75bbe742159e56ad8836531c1d&a=5fae3cf0f1624f39b0341263a6541ea0

PRACTICE: Do the Practice Exercise in the Excel file: 
Case 4 Examples – Practice
(SEE ATTACHED ). Check your work.

You are ready to do the Case 4 problem.

SLP Background

Consider that you may be pretty good sometimes at estimating future probabilities. But you also acknowledge that you might be biased, too. This is where experts are useful, although they do charge a fee for their services. What is the value of the information you could get from an expert? Is it worth paying this expert for his/her advice? Read the paper 
Deciding to Use an Expert
(SEE ATTACHED ) that explains how to make this decision.

Download the Excel file 
SLP 4 Examples-Practice.xlsx
 (SEE ATTACHED ) that provides examples and a Practice Exercise.

Watch this video showing how to determine the value of information: 

http://permalink.fliqz.com/aspx/permalink.aspx?at=f616909cae2d4d06834359502f672aff&a=5fae3cf0f1624f39b0341263a6541ea0

Practice determining the Value of Information; do the Practice Exercise in the Excel file.

You are ready for SLP 4.

Additional Required Reading

(For Discussions, Module 2, 3, and 4)

Download and read 
Subjective Assessments of Risk and Uncertainty
 (SEE ATTACHED ) on subjective probabilities in risk decisions. This paper will be useful for the discussion questions in Module 2, 3, and 4.

Get this journal article from the library. It is lengthy, but you only need to read Section 1.1, pp. 3-5. This section provides a very good review of three major biases that have been studied by the famous team of Kahneman and Tversky.

Laibson, D., & Zeckhauser, R. (1998). Amos Tversky and the ascent of behavioral economics. Journal of Risk & Uncertainty. Feb1998, Vol. 16 Issue 1, p7-47. 41p. Retrieved from Business Source Complete (EBSCO) in the Trident Online Library.

Year 2 Forecast MAPE

ABC Furniture Company
Sales
b1 Year 2 Customers (x) Actual Y(t) Forecast F(t) Y(t) – F(t) PE APE
b0 January 215
February 259
Y= b0+ b1x March 325
April 354
May 258
June 199
July 254
August 299
September 264
October 198
November 223
December 261 ME = Mean error
MPE = Mean percentage error
ME MPE MAPE MAPE = Mean absolute percentage error

SES – MAPE

ABC Furniture Company
Alpha Alpha
0.15 0.9
Year 2 Sales, Y(t) F(t) Y(t) – F(t) PE APE F(t) Y(t) – F(t) PE APE
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August ME = Mean error
September MPE = Mean percentage error
October MAPE = Mean absolute percentage error
November
December
ERROR:#DIV/0! ERROR:#DIV/0! ERROR:#DIV/0! ERROR:#DIV/0! ERROR:#DIV/0! ERROR:#DIV/0!
ME MPE MAPE ME MPE MAPE

Example

Alpha Alpha
0.25 0.85
Mo Sales, Y(t) F(t) Y(t) – F(t) PE APE F(t) Y(t) – F(t) PE APE
1356 1 1798 1798 0.0 0.000 0.000 1798 0.0 0.000 0.000
1225 2 1466 1798.0 -332.0 -0.226 0.226 1798.0 -332.0 -0.226 0.226
1006 3 1118 1715.0 -597.0 -0.534 0.534 1515.8 -397.8 -0.356 0.356
1132 4 1272 1565.8 -293.8 -0.231 0.231 1177.7 94.3 0.074 0.074
1090 5 1095 1492.3 -397.3 -0.363 0.363 1257.9 -162.9 -0.149 0.149
1722 6 1430 1393.0 37.0 0.026 0.026 1119.4 310.6 0.217 0.217
1602 7 1277 1402.2 -125.2 -0.098 0.098 1383.4 -106.4 -0.083 0.083
1709 8 1751 1370.9 380.1 0.217 0.217 1293.0 458.0 0.262 0.262
1547 9 1962 1465.9 496.1 0.253 0.253 1682.3 279.7 0.143 0.143
1227 10 1620 1590.0 30.0 0.019 0.019 1920.0 -300.0 -0.185 0.185
1308 11 1422 1597.5 -175.5 -0.123 0.123 1665.0 -243.0 -0.171 0.171
1536 12 1948 1553.6 394.4 0.202 0.202 1458.5 489.5 0.251 0.251
1513.25 -48.6 -0.072 0.1910 7.5 -0.019 0.1764
ME MPE MAPE ME MPE MAPE

Practice Problem

Alpha Alpha
0.15 0.9
Mo Sales, Y(t) F(t) Y(t) – F(t) PE APE F(t) Y(t) – F(t) PE APE
1 525 525 525
2 293
3 256
4 425
5 753
6 596
7 391
8 563
9 571
10 633
11 653
12 811
539.1666666667
ME MPE MAPE ME MPE MAPE

Practice Problem-Solution

Alpha Alpha
0.15 0.9
Mo Sales, Y(t) F(t) Y(t) – F(t) PE APE F(t) Y(t) – F(t) PE APE
1 525 525 0.0 0.000 0.000 525 0.0 0.000 0.000
2 293 525.0 -232.0 -0.792 0.792 525.0 -232.0 -0.792 0.792
3 256 490.2 -234.2 -0.915 0.915 316.2 -60.2 -0.235 0.235
4 425 455.1 -30.1 -0.071 0.071 262.0 163.0 0.383 0.383
5 753 450.6 302.4 0.402 0.402 408.7 344.3 0.457 0.457
6 596 495.9 100.1 0.168 0.168 718.6 -122.6 -0.206 0.206
7 391 510.9 -119.9 -0.307 0.307 608.3 -217.3 -0.556 0.556
8 563 492.9 70.1 0.124 0.124 412.7 150.3 0.267 0.267
9 571 503.5 67.5 0.118 0.118 548.0 23.0 0.040 0.040
10 633 513.6 119.4 0.189 0.189 568.7 64.3 0.102 0.102
11 653 531.5 121.5 0.186 0.186 626.6 26.4 0.040 0.040
12 811 549.7 261.3 0.322 0.322 650.4 160.6 0.198 0.198
539.1666666667 35.5 -0.048 0.2994 25.0 -0.025 0.2730
ME MPE MAPE ME MPE MAPE
error: Content is protected !!