Chat with us, powered by LiveChat Philosophical Essay - STUDENT SOLUTION USA

Respond to the following prompt with a reasoned argument. Support your position with textual evidence from at least two texts we have read during this course.  

In the introduction, describe what it would mean to live a life that is consistent with what you know to be real. Be sure to formulate your answer in a main claim/thesis that outlines a metaphysical account of reality and an epistemological account of how we know that reality.
In the body of your essay, provide an argument supported by textual evidence for your conception of a life lived in accordance with reality. Indicate what metaphysical and epistemological assumptions or principles would inform your way of life? Support your argument with textual evidence from a at least two author’s we read during the course. Be sure that all claims are supported by textual evidence, and that all direct and indirect references to an author or text are properly cited.
In the response to objections section, raise and respond to at least one objection to your main claim regarding what constitutes a life lived in accordance with reality.
In the conclusion, think through the consequences of understanding your life in the way you have described and how would your life be different from the way it is now.The word meditation in the title suggests how Descartes intended his book to be read—not as a philosophical treatise but as a spiritual exercise (spiritual in terms of subjective experience not necessarily religious). 
Descartes’s Meditations are intended to initiate the meditator into philosophical practice. 
· Just as Plato’s dialogues were training manuals in how to think rather than in what to think, so also Descartes’s Meditations are exercises in philosophical thinking, with an emphasis on the priority of reason rather than imagination. 
· Descartes’s aim in the Meditations is to help the reader discover reality for themselves rather than simply telling the reader what reality is. This reality will be turn out to be substance.
Descartes understood reality in terms of substance.
For Aristotle, there were many different kinds of substances in the world with a plurality of attributes; Descartes revised this view, and suggested that underlying each of the Aristotelian substances was a essential property: extension (the way a material thing extends in space).But there were also immaterial substances: minds that had the essential property of thinking. Beyond the substances of bodies and minds, there was a independent, self-causing, and necessary substance: God.
Descartes held that a substance was that which exists in itself and bears properties. Only God is a substance in this strict sense, but Descartes believed there were two other kinds of substances that had a contingent existence–minds and bodies–whose essential properties were extension and thinking, respectively.
“I have always thought that two issues—namely, God and the soul—are chief among those that ought to be demonstrated with the aid of philosophy rather than theology” (Descartes, “Letter of Dedication,” Meditations on First Philosophy, AT1).
“In the First Meditation the reasons are given why we can …

error: Content is protected !!