Critical review of the Journal Article: “Ontologies describing concepts and relations in a specific domain are necessary for knowledge representation and knowledge exchange. Waterson and Preece define ontology as “he Specification of Shared Knowledge”. Ontologies (semantic data) facilitate the usability of e-technology and realize its full power. here are several Languages, Tools and Formalisms that accompany the term ontology. Among those languages, we enumerate XML (Extensible Markup Language), RDF (Resource Description Framework), RDFS (RDF Schema), DAML+OIL and OWL that are used in several contexts (compatibility with other concepts, expressiveness, etc.). Moreover, there exist several ontology formalisms with a definite advantages and drawbacks, which support particular features. Ontologies should be created for a specific function in the most appropriate formalism satisfying needs of a fine target community.” (Slimani 2015)
(PDF) Ontology Development: A Comparing Study on Tools, Languages and Formalisms (researchgate.net)
Critically review various toolsets used in the design and development of ontology for various scenarios. Document your review in maximum 800 words. You may also refer to any other research articles for more information. Proper citations and referencing must be provided in CU Harvard style. Key findings may include (but not limited to): Introduction to ontology Application areas Explanation with one example
Apply the knowledge gained from the previous section and discuss the role of ontology in Web Development. Further discuss various Semantic Heterogeneity issues on Web
Knowledge Based Web Design (COMP 0372) – Fall 2020 – CW2 (Assignment2) – All – QP
MEC_AMO_TEM_035_02 Page 1 of 7
`
Instructions to Examiner:
Mark all questions.
Deadline of submission: 13/01/2021 23:59
The marks received on the assignment will be scaled down to the actual weightage
of the assignment which is 50 marks
Formative feedback on the complete assignment draft will be provided if the draft is
submitted at least 10 days before the final submission date.
Feedback after final evaluation will be provided after grade appeal period.
Module Learning Outcomes
The following LOs are achieved by the student by completing the assignment successfully
1. Evaluate and design systems for exploiting distributed and integrative ontologies.
2. Use methods for presenting a range of heterogeneous data as semantic web materials.
Assignment Objective
The aim of assignment is to the test student’s ability Evaluate and design systems for exploiting distributed
and integrative ontologies and use methods for presenting a range of heterogeneous data as semantic
web materials.
Assignment Tasks
1) Submit a work proposal for this assignment or before 20/12/20 (23:59) which must include:
Understanding of deliverables – a detail description of deliverables. (3 Marks)
Initial solution for all the given tasks. (3 Marks)
Timeline and references for completion of the given tasks. (4 Marks)
The work proposal must be submitted in a word file through the link available in Moodle.
IN SEMESTER (INDIVIDUAL) ASSIGNMENT-2
Module Code: COMP 0372 Module Name: Knowledge Based Web Design
Level: 3 Max. Marks: 100
Knowledge Based Web Design (COMP 0372) – Fall 2020 – CW2 (Assignment2) – All – QP
MEC_AMO_TEM_035_02 Page 2 of 7
2) Critical review of the Journal Article (40 Marks)
“Ontologies describing concepts and relations in a specific domain are necessary for knowledge
representation and knowledge exchange. Waterson and Preece define ontology as “he Specification of
Shared Knowledge”. Ontologies (semantic data) facilitate the usability of e-technology and realize its full
power. here are several Languages, Tools and Formalisms that accompany the term ontology. Among
those languages, we enumerate XML (Extensible Markup Language), RDF (Resource Description
Framework), RDFS (RDF Schema), DAML+OIL and OWL that are used in several contexts (compatibility with
other concepts, expressiveness, etc.). Moreover, there exist several ontology formalisms with a definite
advantages and drawbacks, which support particular features. Ontologies should be created for a specific
function in the most appropriate formalism satisfying needs of a fine target community.” (Slimani 2015)
Ontology Development: A Comparing Study on Tools, Languages and Formalisms
Source:- Slimani, T. (2015) (PDF) Ontology Development: A Comparing Study on Tools, Languages and
Formalisms [online] available from
Critically review various toolsets used in the design and development of ontology for various scenarios.
Document your review in maximum 800 words. You may also refer to any other research articles for more
information. Proper citations and referencing must be provided in CU Harvard style.
Key findings may include (but not limited to):
Introduction to ontology
Application areas
Explanation with one example
3) Apply the knowledge gained from the previous section and discuss the role of ontology in Web
Development. Further discuss various Semantic Heterogeneity issues on Web. (30 Marks)
4) Register and take up any of the MOOC course as suggested on Moodle. Complete it and attach
the completion certificate (or screenshot showing completion), in the report. Write your
reflections on knowledge gained from this course. Also mention, how this course helped you in
pursuing additional knowledge to complete the various tasks in this assignment. (200 words)
(20 marks)
Rules & Regulations:
All resources should be cited using CU Harvard style in the Report.
Copyright protected images / vector files from online resources are not allowed to be used in this
assignment. Graphics with watermark will not be accepted in the assignment.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/288258366_Ontology_Development_A_Comparing_Study_on_Tools_Languages_and_Formalisms
Knowledge Based Web Design (COMP 0372) – Fall 2020 – CW2 (Assignment2) – All – QP
MEC_AMO_TEM_035_02 Page 3 of 7
The assignment report must have a Title page, Table of Contents, References/ bibliography using
CU Harvard Style and page numbers.
Title Page must have Assignment Name, Module name, Session, your name, ID, and the name of
the faculty.
Softcopy of the report in word format is to be submitted through Turnitin link on Moodle.
Viva shall be conducted after the assignment submission as per the dates informed by the faculty.
Guidelines:
Assignment report must be computer typed.
Font – Times New Roman
Font – Style – Regular
Font – Size – 12
Heading should be with Font Size 14, Bold, Capital and Underline.
Each student has to do the assignment individually.
You can refer books in eLibrary or use internet resource. But you should not cut and paste material
from internet nor provide photocopied material from books. The assignment answers should be
in your own words after understanding the matter from the above resources.
Important Policies to be followed
1. Student Academic Integrity Policy*:
MEC upholds the spirit of academic integrity in all forms of academic work and any form of violation
of academic integrity shall invite severe penalty. Any benefit obtained by indulging in the act of
violation of academic integrity shall be cancelled.
All cases of violation of academic integrity on the part of the student shall fall under any of the below
mentioned categories:
1. Plagiarism
2. Malpractice
3. Ghost Writing
4. Collusion
5. Other cases
If the student fails a module and has a proven case of academic integrity violation in this module, the
student is required to re-register the module. This is applicable to first and second offenders of
plagiarism.
1. Plagiarism
A. First offence of plagiarism
Knowledge Based Web Design (COMP 0372) – Fall 2020 – CW2 (Assignment2) – All – QP
MEC_AMO_TEM_035_02 Page 4 of 7
I. If a student is caught first time in an act of plagiarism during his/her course of study in
any assignment other than project work, the student will be allowed to re-submit the
assignment once, within a maximum period of one week. However, a penalty of
deduction of 25% of the marks obtained for the resubmitted work will be imposed.
II. Period of re-submission: The student will have to re-submit the work one week from the
date he or she is advised to re-submit.
III. If the re-submitted work is also found to be plagiarized, then that assessment will be
awarded a zero mark. Re-submission of the work beyond the maximum period of one
week will not be accepted and the assessment will be awarded a zero mark.
B. Second offence of plagiarism
If any student is caught second time in an act of plagiarism during his/her course of study (in a
subsequent semester), the student will directly be awarded zero for the work in which plagiarism
is detected. In such cases, the student will not be allowed to resubmit the work. A warning of
suspension shall be issued, and student has to sign an undertaking and undergo counselling
session in such cases.
2. Malpractice/Ghostwriting/Collusion
A. First offence of Malpractice/Ghostwriting/Collusion
If a student is caught in an act of Malpractice/Ghostwriting/Collusion for an assessment
component irrespective of coursework or end semester, the student shall fail the module
and shall be required to re-register the module
B. Second Offence of Malpractice/Ghostwriting/Collusion
If a student is caught a second time in an act of Malpractice/Ghostwriting/Collusion for
an assessment component irrespective of coursework or end semester, the student
shall fail the module. A warning of suspension shall be issued, and student has to sign
an undertaking and undergo counselling session in such cases.
3. Third Offence of Academic Integrity Violation
If a student is caught a third time in an act of Academic Integrity Violation for an assessment
component irrespective of coursework or end semester (in a subsequent semester), the student
shall fail the module and also shall be suspended for one semester from the College, as
recommended by institutional level academic committee, Chaired by the Associate Dean, Academic
Affairs.
4. Fourth Offence of Academic Integrity Violation:
If a student is caught a fourth time in an act of Academic Integrity Violation for an assessment
component irrespective of coursework or end semester (in a subsequent semester), the student shall
Knowledge Based Web Design (COMP 0372) – Fall 2020 – CW2 (Assignment2) – All – QP
MEC_AMO_TEM_035_02 Page 5 of 7
fail the module and also shall be expelled from the College, as recommended by institutional level
academic committee, Chaired by the Associate Dean, Academic Affairs.
5. Other cases
If a student commits an act of academic integrity violation as per the definition of “other cases”
mentioned in the previous section or of a different nature, student’s case shall be forwarded to an
institutional level academic committee, Chaired by the Associate Dean, Academic Affairs. The
committee shall investigate the case by means of a viva and/or a disciplinary hearing and shall take
appropriate decision. The penalty that can be granted to a proven case of academic integrity violation
which falls in this category of “other cases” can be a warning/component zero/ module
fail/suspension/expulsion depending on the nature and gravity of the offence.
6. Types/Variations of Cases:
I. If plagiarism is detected in any component of one assessment, the deduction in marks will be
applicable for the whole assessment, even if only the component or part submission alone needs
to be resubmitted.
II. If plagiarism is detected in a group assessment, all students of the group will be considered as
having committed an act of plagiarism and the policy will then be applied to all students
III. If plagiarism is detected in any component of a group assessment, the deduction in marks will be
applicable for the whole assessment even if only the component or part submission alone needs
to be resubmitted.
All students of the group would be considered as having committed an act of plagiarism and the
policy will then be applied to all the students of the group.
IV. If the assessment consists of components or part submissions that could be a group assessment
component (e.g. group assignment) and an individual assessment component (e.g. individual
reflection), the following will be applicable:
a. If plagiarism is detected in the group assessment component, all students of the group
will be considered as having committed an act of plagiarism, The policy will then be
applied to all students of the group. Group assessment component will be resubmitted
as per the policy.
b. If plagiarism is detected in the individual assessment component, the individual
assessment component will be resubmitted and the policy will then be applied to that
student alone.
c. For both (a) and/or (b), the deduction in marks will be applicable for the whole
assessment.
* for further details Refer to MEC Student Academic Integrity Policy in Student Handbook.
2. Late Submission Regulations:
It is the students’ responsibility to check all relevant timelines related to assessments.
Knowledge Based Web Design (COMP 0372) – Fall 2020 – CW2 (Assignment2) – All – QP
MEC_AMO_TEM_035_02 Page 6 of 7
As per the Assessment Policy at MEC, late submissions are allowed for one week (5 working days)
for all UG modules with a penalty. In such cases, a deduction of 5% of the marks obtained for the
submitted work shall be imposed for each working day following the last date of submission
till the date of actual submission. Assessment documents submitted beyond a period of one
week (5 working days) after the last date of submission will not be accepted and will be awarded
a zero for that assessment. In cases where the submission has been delayed due to extenuating
circumstances, the student may be permitted to submit the work without imposing the late
submission policy stated above. The extended period of submission will be one week from the
original last date of submission. In such cases, the student is expected to submit the supporting
certificates on or before the original last date of submission of the assessment and the decision
of extension rests with faculty responsible for the assessment .The late submission policy shall be
applied if the student fails to submit the work within one week of the original last date of
submission.
Students may contact their teachers for clarification on specific details of the submission time if
required.
Students may contact their teachers for clarification on specific details of the submission time if
required.
3. Research Ethics and Biosafety Policy
To protect and respect the rights, dignity, health, safety, and privacy of research subjects involved
including the welfare of animals and the integrity of environment, all student projects are
expected to be undertaken as per the MEC Research Ethics and Biosafety Policy. Accordingly the
following shall apply.
Research and other enterprise activities shall be conducted by maintaining the high ethical
standards consistent with national and international standards and conventions.
Any research at MEC that is categorized as high-risk research shall be subject to review and
approval by the Research Ethics and Biosafety Committee.
Research activities involving collection of human or animal tissues and manipulation of microbial,
animal or plant cells shall be subject to review and approval by the Research Ethics and Biosafety
Committee.
Participants involved in research must be informed about the purpose of research and intended
uses of research findings. Written consent must be obtained from people involved prior to the
commencement of research.
Data obtained from participants must be treated with high confidence and should be used only for the
intended purpose of research.
Knowledge Based Web Design (COMP 0372) – Fall 2020 – CW2 (Assignment2) – All – QP
MEC_AMO_TEM_035_02 Page 7 of 7
Assessment Evaluation Criteria
Assessment Sheet –Assignment Analysis (COMP 0372- Semester: Fall 2020)
Name of the Student : ___________________________________________
Student ID : ________________
Deliverables 0 0-7
8-10
Marks
Task 1 No Submission Partially proposal with timeline or
any other details missing.
Complete and accurate in all aspects
Deliverables 0 01-15 16-20 21-30 31-40 Marks
Task 2
No
Submission
Partially
correct and
incomplete
justification of
the given
statement
Satisfactory and
complete justification
of the given
statement without
clear technical steps
Good and complete
justification of the given
statement with clear
technical steps
Complete
and
accurate
in all
aspects
Deliverables 0 01-10 11-15 16-25 26-30 Marks
Task 3
No
Submission
Partially
correct
explanation
with major
mistakes.
Satisfactory
explanation with
minor mistakes.
Good explanation along
with triples and with proper
references.
Complete
and
accurate
in all
aspects
Deliverables 0 01-08 09-12 13-15 15-20 Marks
Task 4
No
Submission
Partially
completed
MOOC / Poor
writeup
MOOC Completed /
Satisfactory writeup
Good writeup with evidence
attached
Complete
and
accurate
in all
aspects
Remarks:
Signature of evaluator:
Total Marks
Penalty
Final Marks
