Chat with us, powered by LiveChat Ethics homework - for Essays Guru - STUDENT SOLUTION USA

Completed the attached Ethics Project by 4th Nov 10PM PST

Follow the directions given in attached doc and complete it.Ethics Project

Review the seven scenarios, rate them and add brief justification for each. Add your answers directly to this file and save it as EthicsProjectYourName.docx.

These scenarios are based on published works by Professor Whitman and Professor Paradice and are adapted from “Cross-National Differences in Computer-Use Ethics” by Michael E. Whitman, Anthony M. Townsend, and Anthony R. Hendrickson, The Journal of International Business Studies.
Review each scenario carefully and respond to each question using the following statement, choosing the description you feel most appropriate: I feel the actions of this individual were:

(very ethical / ethical / neither ethical nor unethical / unethical / very unethical)

Ethical Decision Evaluation

1. A scientist developed a theory that required proof through the construction of a computer model. He hired a computer programmer to build the model, and the theory was shown to be correct. The scientist won several awards for the development of the theory, but he never acknowledged the contribution of the computer programmer.

The scientist’s failure to acknowledge the computer programmer was:

Explanation:

2. The owner of a small business needed a computer-based accounting system. One day, he identified the various inputs and outputs he felt were required to satisfy his needs. Then he showed his design to a computer programmer and asked the programmer if she could implement such a system. The programmer knew she could implement the system because she had developed much more sophisticated systems in the past. In fact, she thought this design was rather crude and would soon need several major revisions. But she didn’t say anything about her thoughts, because the business owner didn’t ask, and she hoped she might be hired to implement the needed revisions.

The programmer’s decision not to point out the design flaws was:

Explanation:

3. A student found a loophole in …

error: Content is protected !!