CHOOSE ANY TWO PIC FROM THE FOLLOWING AND DO PHOTO ANALYSIS
Attachment 1
Attachment 2
Attachment 3
Attachment 4
Attachment 5
Attachment 6
ATTACHMENT PREVIEW
Download attachment
20180412150300_001 (1).jpg
CRITERIA Thesis Development Interpretation Language &
Style Excellent
(18-20 points) Engaging opening that
introduces the paper? 5
topic, a problem,
research question,
purpose, and method for
writing; the thesis is an
easily identifiable, well-
phrased argument that
recognizes the intended
message, as well as its
purp se and audience.
The t esis reflects sound
critic I, interpretive, and
anal ical thinking; title
and uthor of work are
appr priately identified. Each paragraph clearly
connects to the thesis
and offers identifiable,
well-phrased ideas to be
fully argued in each
paragraph; concrete
details are incorporated
in the body paragraphs
and describe the image
and the different
elements used;
paragraphs are well- organized to create a
coherent, carefully developed and
supported argument;
transitions between
ideas are logical and
each idea builds on the
preceding. Recognizes all of the
elements of style
included in the image
and thoroughly explains
their effects on the
image’s message;
analyzes the image?s
contextual influences
and how they affect the
message; demonstrates a thorough analysis of
the image, as well as its techniques and
message. Paper reflects an
argumentative mode of
writing appropriate for
the topic; it is academic
in tone; writer’s voice is
evident, confident, and
sophisticated;
vocabulary and phrasing
are academically
appropriate, persuasive, Proficient
(16-17 points) Generally engaging
opening; areas to be
strengthened may
include presentation of
general topic,
development of
transition between
general opening and
specific thesis
statement; thesis
statement is phrased as
an argument but may be
strengthened through
clarification of the main
idea being offered and
purpose. Recognizes the
broad intended message
but misses some
nuances. Each paragraph
generally connects to
the thesis but one or
more main ideas may
need to be clari?ed;
concrete details are
generally well-chosen
though some may be
irrelevant or insufficient
as evidence to
effectively support the
thesis and/or paragraph;
recognizes the
relationship between
the image and its
physical characteristics;
paragraphs are generally
well-organized, although
some transitions may be
awkward; focus and
control of argument may
need improvement
because the point of a
paragraph may not
always be clear.
Recognizes most
elements of style used in
the image and attempts
to explain their effects
on the image?s message;
attempts to identify the
image?s contextual
influences but provides
an incomplete analysis
of their effects; provides a good analysis of
message and technique that is generally
comprehensive.
Writing is generally
academic in tone;
writer?s voice may not
be consistently
persuasive but is
discernible; writing
demonstrates an
awareness of the
purpose to persuade;
vocabulary in some Satisfactory
(14-15 points) Opening is functional but
too brief and/or
simplistic; topic is
apparent but needs to
be developed to engage
the reader; weak sense
of purpose and claim;
paragraph topics are
vague or disconnected
from the thesis; thesis
may be too general,
vague, or imprecisely
presented; thesis may
not directly address the
prompt. Recognizes the
intended message and
its purpose but does not
demonstrate knowledge
of its significance.
Supporting ideas within
body paragraphs are
present but weak in one
or more following areas:
main idea not
discernible, a fact about
the text is summarized,
and/or unclear
connections to thesis
exist. Concrete details
are present but weak
because they provide
insuf?cient evidence to
support the body
paragraph and/or lack
insightful inference. Paragraphs
identify the type of
image and some physical
characteristics. Lack of
coherent organization of
ideas within paragraphs;
abrupt transitions that
impede flow. Discusses the elements
of style used in the
image, but does so in a
general sense; explains
only the obvious
contextual influences of
the image; overlooks
some aspects of visual
interpretation. Writing tends to be
mechanical in tone;
writer? 5 voice is not
discernible in the paper;
writing demonstrates
inconsistent awareness
of the purpose to
persuade; vocabulary
tends to be simplistic,
marked by instances of Deficient
(0-12 points) Unsatisfactory
(12-13 points) Fails to fulfill the
requirements of the
assignment. Opening is ineffective,
poorly organized, and
underdeveloped; thesis
statement may
summarize plot points
rather than present
argument about text or
may be missing; thesis
may not address the
prompt or a viable topic;
author and/or title of
image may not be
referenced properly
Does not identify the
deeper purpose of the
image. Fails to fulfill the
requirements of the
assignment. Topic sentences absent
or consistently lack
focused ideas, either
offering general,
irrelevant comments or
stating facts about the
text; there is no
discernible argument or
point guiding the paper;
concrete details are
absent or ineffective/
insufficient; consistent
lack of coherent
organization of ideas
within paragraphs and
from one paragraph to
the next; points of
paragraphs are unclear.
Identifies the type of
image and some of its
physical elements. Identi?es most of the
elements of style used in
the image, but does not
explain their
significance; does not
demonstrate recognition
of the image?s deeper
purpose; attempt at
analysis is rudimentary. Fails to ful?ll the
requirements of the
assignment. Writing is mechanical in
tone; writer?s voice is
not discernible; writing
demonstrates no
awareness of the
purpose to persuade;
vocabulary is simplistic
and/or inappropriate. Fails to fulfill the
requirements of the
assignment.
Read more In order to conduct a photo analysis, you need to understand what is an analysis. An analysis is a comprehensive explanation… View the full answer