Chat with us, powered by LiveChat LeadershipFinalProjectRubric.docx - STUDENT SOLUTION USA

Create a PowerPoint.

· From the chosen topic, respond in detail, addressing each question or main point.

My Topic/Questions:

Quadruple Aim of Healthcare

1.What are the guidelines for the quadruple aim?

2.What is the importance of achieving the quadruple aim?

3.What outcomes may be seen from promoting the leader-follower relationship?

· Slides should be professional, well organized, and show evidence of critical thinking and creativity.

· The slides should not contain paragraphs, but bullet points, highlighting your main ideas. 

· The  speaker notes section of each slide should include your narrative- what you would state if speaking to an audience. The bulk of your information should be listed here. 

· Maximum of 12 slides, excluding title and reference slides. 

· Three references listed within past five years listed in Current APA Style.

References:

Arnetz, B. B., Goetz, C. M., Arnetz, J. E., Sudan, S., vanSchagen, J., Piersma, K., & Reyelts, F. (2020). Enhancing healthcare efficiency to achieve the Quadruple Aim: an exploratory study. BMC research notes, 13(1), 362. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-020-05199-8

Malcolm Cox, M, Scott-Blouin, A., Cuff, P., Paniagua, M., Phillips, S., & Vlasses, P. H. (2017). The Role of Accreditation in Achieving the Quadruple Aim. Retrieved from: https://nam.edu/the-role-of-accreditation-in-achieving-the-quadruple-aim/

Rathert, C., Williams, E. S., & Linhart, H. (2018). Evidence for the Quadruple Aim: A Systematic Review of the Literature on Physician Burnout and Patient Outcomes. Medical care, 56(12), 976–984. https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000000999

(If other references are found, its ok to switch the ones included)

Please do not use any AI to complete assignment.

Leadership Final Project Rubric

Leadership Final Project Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Analysis

50 to >42.5 pts

Meets or Exceeds Expectations

Communicates purpose of project with superior understanding of material, shows insight and engages patients or reader. Style is appropriate for intended audience. Presents an exemplary articulation and insightful analysis of significant concepts and/or theories presented for the chosen topic. Ideas are professionally sound and creative; they are supported by scientific evidence that is credible and timely.

42.5 to >37.5 pts

Mostly Meets Expectations

Presents an accurate understanding of the chosen topic, but might be missing a detail or two or miss the intended audience. Ideas are mostly supported by scientific evidence that is credible and timely.

37.5 to >29.5 pts

Below Expectations

Provides insufficient explanations of significant concepts for the chosen topic. Ideas are generally unsupported by scientific evidence, but some attempt has been made.

29.5 to >0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

Does not, or incorrectly, portrays the purpose of the project; Offers insufficient explanations for the chosen topic; Information is not scientifically sound.

50 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent

50 to >42.5 pts

Meets or Exceeds Expectations

Offers detailed and specific examples to educate on the chosen topic. Includes a minimum of five tips for preventive care for the patient. Includes information that should be shared with family or caregivers. Includes local resources in the community that might be available. Includes at least three references.

42.5 to >37.5 pts

Mostly Meets Expectations

Offers specific examples to educate on the chosen topic, but might be missing one or two details. The project indicates a more general understanding of the concepts to educate on the chosen topic. Either missing the full five preventative tips, information for family or caregivers, or an important local resource.

37.5 to >29.5 pts

Below Expectations

Provides several insufficient or inaccurate examples, although attempts are made to address some key points on the topic chosen. The project indicates an introductory understanding of the concepts to educate on the chosen topic.

29.5 to >0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

Information is inaccurate or inadequate. The project indicates little or no understanding of the concepts for the chosen topic.

50 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics

30 to >25.5 pts

Meets or Exceeds Expectations

Information is well organized and clearly communicated. The project is free of spelling and grammatical errors.

25.5 to >22.5 pts

Mostly Meets Expectations

The information is well written or orally presented throughout, and the information is reasonably organized and communicated. The project is mostly free of spelling and grammatical errors.

22.5 to >17.7 pts

Below Expectations

The information is somewhat organized and lacks some clarity. Contains some spelling and grammatical errors.

17.7 to >0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

The information is not well written or orally presented and lacks clarity. Information is poorly organized. The project contains many spelling and grammatical errors.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Format

20 to >17.0 pts

Meets or Exceeds Expectations

Follows all the requirements related to format, length, source citations, and layout.

17 to >15.0 pts

Mostly Meets Expectations

Follows all the requirements related to format, length, source citations, and layout.

15 to >11.8 pts

Below Expectations

Follows most of the requirements related to format, length, source citations, and layout.

11.8 to >0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

Does not follow format, length, source citations, and layout requirements.

20 pts

Total Points: 150

error: Content is protected !!