A. Develop a written proposal by doing the following:
1. Identify a problem or issue related to practice, policy, population, or education that
aligns with the organizational priorities you seek to solve.
Note: You may need to meet with your organization or practice setting, your manager, or
your supervisor to help choose a current problem or issue.
a. Explain the problem or issue, including why it is applicable to the area of practice you
chose and the healthcare environment.
2. Discuss your investigation of the problem or issue.
a. Provide evidence to substantiate the problem or issue (e.g., organizational assessment,
national source documents, evidence from a stakeholder).
3. Analyze the state of the situation using current data.
a. Analyze areas that might be contributing to the problem or issue.
4. Propose a solution or innovation for the problem or issue.
a. Justify your proposed solution or innovation based on the results of your investigation
and analysis.
5. Recommend resources to implement your proposed solution or innovation. Include a
cost-benefit analysis of your proposed solution or innovation.
6. Provide a timeline for implementation based on your proposal.
7. Discuss why each key stakeholder or partner is important for the implementation of the
solution or innovation.
a. Summarize your engagement with the key stakeholders or partners, including the
input and feedback you received.
b. Discuss how you intend to work with those key stakeholders or partners in order to
achieve success.
8. Discuss how your proposed solution or innovation could be implemented, including how
the implementation could be evaluated for success.
B.
Explain how you fulfilled the following roles during your process of investigation and
proposal development:
1. scientist
2. detective
3. manager of the healing environment
C.
Submit the completed attached “Professional Verification Form” from the organizational
leader advising you in your leadership experience.
D. Acknowledge sources, using APA-formatted in-text citations and references, for content
that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.
E. Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your
submission.
Rubric
-The identified problem or issue is related to practice, policy, population, or education, and it
aligns with organizational priorities that are in need of solving.
-The explanation of the problem or issue includes an appropriate, logical rationale for why the
problem or issue applies to the chosen area of practice and the healthcare environment.
-The discussion of the investigation of the problem or issue is logical and sufficiently detailed.
The discussion of the investigation is thorough and relates to the problem or issue.
-The provided evidence substantiates the problem or issue because it is an appropriate form of
evidence (e.g., organizational assessment, national source documents, or evidence from a
stakeholder), and it logically supports the problem or issue.
-The analysis addresses the state of the situation using current data, and it is plausible and well
supported with specific examples.
-The analysis addresses all the areas that potentially contribute to the problem or issue. The
analysis is plausible and well supported with specific examples.
-An appropriate solution or innovation is proposed for the problem or issue. The solution or
innovation is logical, well reasoned, and includes all significant components.
-The justification of the proposed solution or innovation makes logical connections between the
problem and the solution, and it is based on the results of the investigation and analysis.
-The resources recommended for implementation of the proposed solution or innovation are
appropriate for the needs of the solution or innovation. The recommendation includes all
essential resources. A cost-benefit analysis is included, and it is a logical and accurate
representation of the needs of the proposed solution or innovation.
-The timeline is accurate and achievable for the needs of the proposed solution or innovation.
-All of the key stakeholders or partners that are identified are appropriate for the implementation
of the solution or innovation, and there are no missing essential stakeholders or partners. The
discussion also addresses why each identified stakeholder or partner is important for the
implementation of the solution or innovation.
-The summary of the engagement with the key stakeholders or partners is sufficiently detailed
and meaningful, and it includes the input and feedback received from them.
-The discussion effectively addresses how to work with the key stakeholders or partners
discussed in part A7 in order to achieve success. The discussion is logical and includes
supportive details.
-The discussion effectively addresses how the proposed solution or innovation could be
implemented. The plan for implementation is logical and thorough. The discussion includes an
appropriate, well-supported, and well-reasoned plan for how the implementation could be
evaluated for success.
-The explanation effectively addresses how the role of the scientist was fulfilled during the
investigation process and proposal development. The explanation is detailed and includes
specific, relevant examples.
-The explanation effectively addresses how the role of the detective was fulfilled during the
investigation process and proposal development. The explanation is detailed and includes
specific, relevant examples.
-The explanation effectively addresses how the role of the manager of the healing environment
was fulfilled during the investigation process and proposal development. The explanation is
detailed and includes specific, relevant examples.
-The submission of the “Professional Verification Form” from the organizational leader advising
leadership experience is complete.
-The submission includes in-text citations and references for content that is quoted, paraphrased,
or summarized and demonstrates a consistent application of APA style.
-Content reflects attention to detail, is organized, and focuses on the main ideas as prescribed in
the task or chosen by the candidate. Terminology is pertinent, is used correctly, and effectively
conveys the intended meaning. Mechanics, usage, and grammar promote accurate interpretation
and understanding.

Purchase answer to see full
attachment