Week 1 Assignment (Due in 2 Days)/Week 1 Assignment (Required Assignment).docx

My Note: (Required 4-5 Pages)

(100% Original Plagiarism free work ) Due in 2 days

Must be include all assignment requirement and follow Rubric Superior Criteria

Course Name : DDBA 85 10 Seminar in Global Supply Chain Management

Assignment: Foundations of Global Supply Chain Management Taxonomy

(Required 4-5 Pages)

To prepare for this Assignment,?review this week?s Learning Resources as well as any additional sources of your choosing. Conduct research to identify theorists who developed theories related to global supply chain management and compile key information as part of your review (see below). One example, is the Eli?s Goldratt?s theory of constraints. Other examples might include the transaction cost economics (TCE) and resource-based view (RBV) theories. The intent of this Assignment is to familiarize you with theories that you will find helpful as you complete your presentation and your Week 7 Assignment.

By Day 7

Submit?an evaluation of at least three foundational theories in the form of a properly formatted, APA-compliant taxonomy table. For each of the theories you select, you should include the following:

? The name of the theory

? The year the theory was introduced

? The theorist/author

? Key components of the theory

For each theory presented, be sure to include?at least one theorist?s seminal reference and one reference from a peer-reviewed, scholarly journal. Be sure you use these as appropriate in-text citations as well.

Refer to the Week 1 Assignment Rubric for specific grading elements and criteria. Your Instructor will use this rubric to assess your work.

Rubric Detail:Assignment should be follow Rubric Superior Criteria

?

?	Superior Criteria	Excellent Criteria	Satisfactory Criteria	Marginal Criteria	Unsatisfactory Criteria	Not Submitted
Element 1: Theory 1	7.5?(15%) Student presents a thorough and detailed evaluation of a global supply chain management in a properly formatted, APA-compliant taxonomy table that includes the name of the theory, date the theory was introduced, theorist/author, key components of the theory, and explains how the theory is related to the complex, real-world problems common to the practice of global supply chain management. At least one theorist’s seminal reference and one reference from a peer-reviewed journal included.	7.12?(14.25%) Student presents a thorough and detailed evaluation of a marketing theory in a properly formatted, APA-compliant taxonomy table that includes the name of the theory, date the theory was introduced, theorist/author, key components of the theory, and explains how the theory is related to the complex, real-world problems common to the practice of global supply chain management. There are one or two minor errors.	6.38?(12.75%) Student presents an evaluation with some details of a marketing theory in a properly formatted, APA-compliant taxonomy table that includes the name of the theory, date the theory was introduced, theorist/author, key components of the theory, and explains how the theory is related to the complex, real-world problems common to the practice of global supply chain management. Some details are missing.	5.62?(11.25%) Student presents a cursory or incomplete evaluation of a marketing theory in a properly formatted, APA-compliant taxonomy table that includes the name of the theory, date the theory was introduced, theorist/author, key components of the theory, and explains how the theory is related to the complex, real-world problems common to the practice of global supply chain management. Many details are missing.	3.75?(7.5%) Does not meet minimal standards.	0?(0%) Did not submit element.
Element 2: Theory 2	7.5?(15%) Student presents a thorough and detailed evaluation of a marketing theory in a properly formatted, APA-compliant taxonomy table that includes the name of the theory, date the theory was introduced, theorist/author, key components of the theory, and explains how the theory is related to the complex, real-world problems common to the practice of global supply chain management.	7.12?(14.25%) Student presents a thorough and detailed evaluation of a marketing theory in a properly formatted, APA-compliant taxonomy table that includes the name of the theory, date the theory was introduced, theorist/author, key components of the theory, and explains how the theory is related to the complex, real-world problems common to the practice of global supply chain management. There are one or two minor errors.	6.38?(12.75%) Student presents an evaluation with some details of a marketing theory in a properly formatted, APA-compliant taxonomy table that includes the name of the theory, date the theory was introduced, theorist/author, key components of the theory, and explains how the theory is related to the complex, real-world problems common to the practice of global supply chain management. Some details are missing.	5.62?(11.25%) Student presents a cursory or incomplete evaluation of a marketing theory in a properly formatted, APA-compliant taxonomy table that includes the name of the theory, date the theory was introduced, theorist/author, key components of the theory, and explains how the theory is related to the complex, real-world problems common to the practice of global supply chain management. Many details are missing.	3.75?(7.5%) Does not meet minimal standards.	0?(0%) Did not submit element.
Element 3: Theory 3	7.5?(15%) Student presents a thorough and detailed evaluation of a marketing theory in a properly formatted, APA-compliant taxonomy table that includes the name of the theory, date the theory was introduced, theorist/author, key components of the theory, and explains how the theory is related to the complex, real-world problems common to the practice of global supply chain management.	7.12?(14.25%) Student presents a thorough and detailed evaluation of a marketing theory in a properly formatted, APA-compliant taxonomy table that includes the name of the theory, date the theory was introduced, theorist/author, key components of the theory, and explains how the theory is related to the complex, real-world problems common to the practice of global supply chain management. There are one or two minor errors.	6.38?(12.75%) Student presents an evaluation with some details of a marketing theory in a properly formatted, APA-compliant taxonomy table that includes the name of the theory, date the theory was introduced, theorist/author, key components of the theory, and explains how the theory is related to the complex, real-world problems common to the practice of global supply chain management. Some details are missing.	5.62?(11.25%) Student presents a cursory or incomplete evaluation of a marketing theory in a properly formatted, APA-compliant taxonomy table that includes the name of the theory, date the theory was introduced, theorist/author, key components of the theory, and explains how the theory is related to the complex, real-world problems common to the practice of global supply chain management. Many details are missing.	3.75?(7.5%) Does not meet minimal standards.	0?(0%) Did not submit element.
Element 4: Sources to Support Theories	7.5?(15%) Student provides at least one theorist’s seminal reference and at least two references from a peer-reviewed journal for each theory.	7.12?(14.25%) Student provides at least one theorist’s seminal reference and at least one references from a peer-reviewed journal for each theory.	6.38?(12.75%) Student provides at least one theorist’s seminal reference and at least one references from a peer-reviewed journal for each theory; however, one or two of the references do not support the theory and/or a better reference is more appropriate.	5.62?(11.25%) Student provides at least two references for each theory but is missing more than two seminal references and/or more than two references do not support the theory.	3.75?(7.5%) Does not meet minimal standards.	0?(0%) Did not submit element.
Element 5: Critical Thinking	5?(10%) Writing exhibits excellent evidence of thoughtful critical analysis and thinking; careful examination is made of assumptions and possible biases, with detailed supporting rationale. Writing synthesizes the classroom experiences and content; analyzes patterns or connections between theory and practice; and draws logical conclusions based on well-reasoned, superb arguments.	4.75?(9.5%) Writing exhibits excellent evidence of thoughtful critical analysis and thinking; careful examination is made of assumptions and possible biases, with detailed supporting rationale. Writing synthesizes the classroom experiences and content; analyzes patterns or connections between theory and practice; and draws logical conclusions based on well-reasoned, superb arguments. There are one or two minor errors in explanation.	4.25?(8.5%) Writing exhibits some evidence of thoughtful critical analysis and thinking. A good examination is made of assumptions and possible biases, with some supporting rationale. Writing synthesizes the classroom experiences and content; analyzes patterns or connections between theory and practice; and draws logical conclusions based on well-reasoned arguments adequately, but not superbly.	3.75?(7.5%) Writing exhibits little evidence of thoughtful critical analysis and thinking. Examination is not made of assumptions and possible biases. Writing does not synthesize the classroom experiences and content, nor analyzes patterns or connections between theory and practice. Logical conclusions based on well-reasoned arguments are not exhibited.	2.5?(5%) Does not meet minimal standards.	0?(0%) Did not submit element.
Element 6: Written Delivery Style & Grammar	7.5?(15%) Student consistently follows APA writing style and basic rules of formal English grammar and written essay style. Student communicates in a cohesive, logical style. There are no spelling or grammar errors.	7.12?(14.25%) Student consistently follows APA writing style and basic rules of formal English grammar and written essay style. Student communicates in a cohesive, logical style. There are one or two minor errors in spelling or grammar.	6.38?(12.75%) Student mostly follows APA writing style and basic rules of formal English grammar and written essay style. Student mostly communicates in a cohesive, logical style. There are some errors in spelling or grammar.	5.62?(11.25%) Student does not follow APA writing style and basic rules of formal English grammar and written essay style, and does not communicate in a cohesive, logical style.	3.75?(7.5%) Does not meet minimal standards.	0?(0%) Did not submit element.
Element 7: Formal and Appropriate Documentation of Evidence, Attribution of Ideas (APA Citations)	7.5?(15%) Student demonstrates full adherence to scholarly reference requirements and adheres to APA style with respect to source attribution, references, heading and subheading logic, table of contents, and lists of charts, etc. There are no APA errors.	7.12?(14.25%) Student demonstrates full adherence to scholarly reference requirements and adheres to APA style with respect to source attribution, references, heading and subheading logic, table of contents, and lists of charts, etc. There are one or two minor errors in APA style or format.	6.38?(12.75%) Student mostly adheres to scholarly reference requirements and/or mostly adheres to APA style with respect to source attribution, references, heading and subheading logic, table of contents, and lists of charts, etc. Some errors in APA format and style are evident.	5.62?(11.25%) Student demonstrates weak or inconsistent adherence to scholarly reference requirements and/or applies inconsistent adherence to APA style with respect to source attribution, references, heading and subheading logic, table of contents, and lists of charts, etc. Several errors in APA format and style are evident.	3.75?(7.5%) Does not meet minimal standards.	0?(0%) Did not submit element.

Learning Resources

Required Readings

Andersson, R., & Pardillo-Baez, Y. (2020). The Six Sigma framework improves the awareness and management of supply-chain risk. The TQM Journal, 32(5), 1021-1037. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-04-2019-0120

Gupta, N., Tiwari, A., Bukkapatnam, S. T., & Karri, R. (2020). Additive manufacturing cyber-physical system: Supply chain cybersecurity and risks. IEEE Access, 8, 47322-47333. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2978815

Marchesini, M. M. P., & Alc?ntara, R. L. C. (2016). Logistics activities in supply chain business process: A conceptual framework to guide their implementation. International Journal of Logistics Management, 27(1), 6-30. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-04-2014-0068

Sarkis, J. (2021). Supply chain sustainability: Learning from the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 41(1), 63-73. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-08-2020-0568

Optional Resources

Aydinliyim, T., & Murthy, N. N. (2016). Managing engineering design for competitive sourcing in closed-loop supply chains. Decision Sciences, 47(2), 257-297. https://doi.org/10.1111/deci.12164

Mangla, S. K., Kusi-Sarpong, S., Luthra, S., Bai, C., Jakhar, S. K., & Khan, S. A. (2020). Operational excellence for improving sustainable supply chain performance. Resources, Conservation, and Recycling, 162, 105025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105025

Exit

Exit